Visualizing The Hobbit

 

Rankin and Bass' The Hobbit characters

The Hobbit is a children's book, written as one and presented as one. Part of why it holds up so well on so many rereadings for me as an adult is because it's charming. There's a delightful playfulness to most of the encounters. The trolls are Cockney yobs. The Great Goblin isn't terrifying, but imperiously ridiculous. Bilbo starts as wonderfully, ridiculously proper middle-class character, thrust, only mostly against his will, into a wilder and woolier world reacts in just the way most of us would in similar circumstances.

After I rewatched Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings movies, I set myself an even more onerous task: I watched all three installments of his version of The Hobbit. It is, in every scene and in every way, an utterly charmless movie. The slightly bumbling coal-mining dwarves of Tolkien's book with their colorful cloaks and hoods have been replaced with terrible looking characters who seem to have raided a Klingon arms locker for their weapons. 

You can read the book in an afternoon. The theatrical versions of the movies are almost eight hours long. The extended versions - the ones I suffered through - add another two hours of terrible, made up elements. Every exciting moment in the books is turned into a bloated and very bad roller coaster ride. Everything is BIGGER and LOUDER and TERRIBLE. He took a short children's story and turned into a obnoxious video game that feels like it'll never had the decency to end. 

My favorite film depiction of Tolkien's world is in the Rankin & Bass The Hobbit (1977). Directed by Rankin and Bass (creators of all those wonderful stop-motion Christmas specials), it was animated by Topcraft, a studio in Japan. Topcraft would go on to produce Hayao Miyazaki's first movie, Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind. When it folded, Miyazaki picked up some of its pieces to create Studio Ghibli.

The character designs were by Lester Abrams who had illustrated a chapter of the book, Riddles in the Dark, for Children's Digest (something I'd come across, probably in my dentist's office). Arthur Rankin had seen them and liked them well-enough to have Abrams do all the other initial character designs as well.

Yes, the elves, especially the wood elves, look awful, but they are strange and unworldly the way elves probably should be. All the other characters, though, I think are perfect. Bilbo is stout and slightly ridiculous, while the dwarves range from the the comical Ori and Nori to the wise-looking Balin and the imposing Thorin. The trolls and goblins are both gruesome and comical looking. Smaug, voiced by Richard Boone is far more regal and monstrous than Jackson's CGI creation. 

 

John Houston as Gandalf is fantastic, as is Orson Bean as Bilbo, and, especially, Brother Theodore as Gollum (even though he looks more like a frog than a hobbit, it's still how I tend to imagine Gollum looking). I actually like Martin Freeman in the Jackson atrocities, but he's squandered among a host of mostly undistinguished performances and characters that lack much semblance to Tolkien's creations.

 

Something I really like about the animated Hobbit is the design of Laketown and the humans. Instead of a generic medieval town, it looks like something from the early dark ages in Northern Europe. The same goes for the look of the town's citizens. It's defenders are simple militia men withouth armor and it's a small town, not the sprawling, corrupt metropolis of Jackson's imagining.

As an adaptation of The Hobbit, the Rankin & Bass version is moderately successful. It doesn't eliminate too much, though it does condense what remains. Still, it's far truer in tone and spirit to Tolkien's book than anything Jackson put on the screen.

Art from the Lord of the Rings: Covers From My Youth

If you aren't already aware, let me tell you there's been tons and tons of art created for The Lord of the Rings. Of course there were the Brothers Hildebrandt's calendars I posted about recently, but there's so much more.

I'll start with the covers for the editions I grew up with. The first are wild, psychedelic paintings by Barbara Remington. She hadn't read the books when she created them but had to go on a synopsis from a friend. So the original cover for The Hobbit she did had a lion and fruit that looked like some sort of wild gourds. Later versions removed the cat, but left in the pumpkins.

The second covers I became familiar with were paintings by Prof. Tolkien himself. I love his paintings, all washed out colors and faceted like something hand carved. I'll do a full post of his artwork soon. 

Hobbiton on the Styx

Barrels Out of Bond

Emus? Cassowaries? 

Hobbiton

OK, Shelob and Cirith Ungol. Pretty cool.

Fangorn Forest

The Armies of Sauron... on crack!

Barad-dûr and Mount Doom

The Remington covers were so popular they were made available as a poster. Her work was lampooned on the cover of Bored of the Rings as well.

The Hobbit - like you haven't seen this already

   So here we go.  The trailer looks so much better than my expectations for the movie allow me to believe it to be.  That's based entirely on Peter Jackson's track record of pretty much botching the LOTR movies.  How so you ask?  By making Gandalf look like a high strung fool, Aragorn like a reluctant king, making Elrond runaway, etc. And there's more but why bother?

   Like the LOTR movies, this will look gorgeous and mostly spot on.  It's a less complex book than the LOTR so maybe he won't be tempted to "improve" on Tolkien's characters.  He clearly felt the need to up the action and fanboy quotient by portraying all sorts of stuff from the Unfinished Tales and LOTR appendices. Whatever.