After nearly two years of retirement from
Black Gate, I'm coming back. I'm brushing the cobwebs out of my brain, flexing my writing muscles, and gearing up for a return to the electronic pages of the best fantasy (and horror, and sci-fi, and crime fiction) magazine around. The luminous Mrs. V. has already signed back on to edit my work so it'll be coherent.
There'll be two significant changes. The first is I'll be posting monthly, not weekly. Each new article will post on the first Friday of the month, starting in December. I figure a lighter schedule is the way to go. Five years of reading and reviewing three books and a half dozen or more short stories every month burned me out.
The other is I'll be reading classic works I haven't read before (or only once a long time ago - I've always got to give myself some sort of wiggle room - which specifically mean Gormenghast). The first book, which I've already started, is Hope Mirrlees' Lud-in-the-Mist. The Last Unicorn, and The Ship of Ishtar, as well as some Gothic romances, including Melmoth the Wanderer and Frankenstein, are some others I think I'll give a go. I can imagine reading things not as old, but I definitely want to focus on some of the books most important to the evolution of fantasy literature.
I want to dig into fantasy from before genrefication took hold. That's what I call the point when fantasy got locked down. It was as if clear limitations were staked out marking out what is and isn't fantasy. Fantasy was reduced to no more than a commodity and tropes have come to supplant the unique and strange. Much contemporary fantasy seems to be written by authors for whom only other fantasy exists and those are their only influences. It's a copy of a copy, not something inspired and drawn up from the deeper wells of our shared cultures and myths. It often reads like a gaming campaign, complete with detailed magic systems and character classes. There's also the whole grimdark business which seems intent on eliminating the fantastic from fantasy much of the time.
I think it was the explosion of epic fantasy series in the eighties and nineties and the commercial success of the genre that much of the strangeness went out of it. When Lester Del Rey deliberately set out to find a Xerox copy of the Lord of the Rings and discovered The Sword of Shannara (reviewed here) can be seen as the actual start of all this. For over a decade we were blessed with an endless slew of often hard to differentiate epic series. Now, with grittiness all the rage, everyone is aping George R.R. Martin or Joe Abercrombie. The tropes have changed a bit, but we're still getting lots of not very dissimilar epic series - just "grittier."
I know well-received books like Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell that don't limit themselves to the tired and true (hey, I haven't read that, so I might add it to the list) still appear from time to time, but they are anomalies. A few writers are still inspired by pulp and older fantasy (James Enge, Howard Andrew Jones, and Raphael Ordoñez among them), but there's little room for the dreamlike imagination of many early fantasies or the magpie mixtures of sci-fi, horror, and anything else that suited the fancies of writers like William Hope Hodgson or Clark Ashton Smith. If you're not new here you know this is one of the hobby horses I ride the hardest. I'll make every effort to not be a bore.
I'm also hoping to get some Western movie reviews up again. It's not like I haven't watched a ton of them since the last time I posted a review (here).
I look forward to it. I reread the Gormenghast trilogy about a year ago. This time I really enjoyed the first two books, but the third I had to force myself to get through.
ReplyDeleteSo, I've never read the third book (or the fragmentary fourth one). I guess I should one day, but it sounds like such a letdown after the first two.
DeleteI thought it was, but you may not.
DeleteThis is fantastic news to read on a grey and covid-19 afflicted Monday morning here in Sweden! As someone who also writes reviews (some books, mostly RPGs) I know it takes time & energy so this is a wise decision. Also, going back to the classics is a great idea and I agree with your analysis. I do look forward reading your reviews a lot!
ReplyDeleteThank you! Is any of your stuff in English, and if so, where can I read it?
DeleteSadly only in Swedish. The only one in English is this one
Deletehttps://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/17/17010.phtml
I´ll probably write more in English in the future and then I'll let you know!
At least there's some good news. Of the works you mentioned, in the first paragraph, I've read all but THE SHIP OF ISHTAR and FRANKENSTEIN. I'm looking forward to what you think of Melmoth.
ReplyDeleteMelmoth is part of the thick-volumed Gothic collection I assembled years ago and then...never read. It's up there alongside The Monk, Confessions of a Justified Sinner, Vathek, and several more.
Delete