Sword and Sorceress - ed. Marion Zimmer Bradley
The
second great wave of swords & sorcery was in the sixties and
seventies making it contemporaneous with great changes sweeping Western
culture. One of those changes was feminism and as in the rest of society it made inroads into even such minor things as S&S.
Women had always written S&S, C. L. Moore in particular helping
lay its foundations. Still, it was dominated by men in its
creation and its consumption. That reality led to several
explicitly feminist anthologies looking to open wide
the doors of something seen by many as a boys-only club.
The first was
Jessica Amanda Salmonson's "Amazons!" and the second
was Marion Zimmer
Bradley's "Sword and Sorceress". Salmonson
only managed a second volume of "Amazons" but Bradley's
spawned a series that ran to nineteen sequels before her death and
six more since.
Unlike
Salmonson, Bradley introduces her book not with a call to arms but by informing
the reader she could not envision female themed heroic fiction as
simply stories that switched "mighty Amazon warrior for a
hearty hero". In fact her introduction to "Sword and
Sorceress" reads like a direct response to Salmonson's fiery
broadside.
First
she states she believes no historical basis for any sort of
matriarchal or Amazonian societies exists and then she attacks the
very idea of the Amazon as an empowering image. Quoting Abby
Kleinbaum, she claims that in most classical stories Amazons were
defeated and or raped. They exist, not as bold women, but
instead as some sort of male creation drawn into existence to prove
men could conquer them.
But
why, asks Bradley, is the image so persistent and even popular among
women. It and other cliches exist and lay the basis for much of
the woman oriented heroic fantasy submitted to her, so why? She
never comes up with an answer why but I suspect she hoped readers
would simply find an answer in the material. My own belief is that,
classical tales aside, the real case is that it is an empowering and artistically
inspiring image that allows authors to examine and present women as adventurous and courageous as men.
|
Marion Zimmer Bradley |
Another
trope she encountered and initially found distasteful was that of
rape and revenge. She actually hoped to include no submissions using it but found herself unable to. At the outset
of heroic fantasy, specifically in C. L. Moore's "Black God's
Kiss" the theme was present. She notes that she had once
written that "(in heroic fiction) the seamy underside is always
rape". Her question was, and it's a significant one, what
actually happens at story's end when the warrior claims his prize of
treasure and the girl? It's an good example of the sort of insights Salmson, Bradley and all the authors involved in these books were trying to impart to S&S. In the end she included three such
stories in "Sword and Sorceress".
Alongside
Amazons and rape there are comical episodes, peaceful sorceresses and
other things in "Sword and Sorceress". What binds them together is the simple emphasis on women protagonists. But Bradley was trying to do something more than just set the stage for female characters. Her stated goal was to present female-centric S&S that felt real, that addressed both the female
and male halves of the world. Feminist propaganda is as awful
as sexist male fiction she warns. With tales by men as well as
women she believed she reached her
objective and kept it entertaining.
Despite her excellent intentions, "Swords
and Sorceress" is a surprising disappointment. There are
good, even excellent stories (would it surprise you Charles Saunder's
story is one of them?) here but too many that are not. Bradley's goal is broader and subtler
than Salmonson's but the result is a book less exciting than
"Amazons!". Salmonson's punch-to-the-eye attach turned out to be just right for S&S, Bradley's less militant approach not so much.
"Amazons!"'s authors took the traditionally male
virtues of physical strength and courage and adventurousness and
applied them to female characters and more often than not it worked. Perhaps because she started from a less confrontational place, less looking to create warrior women, Bradley let in too much that's not particularly valid even by very wide definition of S&S. She gives the reader too
many stories that are simply general fantasy. As such they too
often lack the narrative drive and excitement that are among S&S
chief hallmarks.
Eight of the stories qualify as S&S and
all save one of the best are among them. When she lets in the
amazons and bold thieves the stories work better than where they're
absent. Both editors sought to bring women in from the
roles of damsels in distress, maidens in need of conquering or sidekicks and out to center stage as heroes. "Amazons!"
however is true to the verve and action as well as the darkness of
S&S. Too often the tales in "Sword and Sorceress" are muted in tone and plot.
|
Phyllis Ann Karr |
That
being said, "Sword and Sorceress" opens with the thoroughly
respectable "The Garnet and the Glory" by PhyllisAnn Karr. Her series characters, sorceress Frostflower and
warrior Thorn, find themselves drawn into the Old Hills by the
unknown and alien sorcerer Dathru. More intriguing than
exciting, "The Garnet and the Glory" features a struggle
between differing types of magic and the different methods of
fighting Frostflower and Thorn.
Glen
Cook's "Severed Heads" is set in the faux-Arabian
lands of his Dread Empire novels. A girl is raped by a sorcerer
and later he returns to steal the son born of that violent union. In
response she casts off the restrictions of her sex and takes on the
skills of a warrior and seeks out her attacker and son. Written
with Cook's usual blunt brutality, "Severed Heads" is one
of the better stories in the collection.
"Taking
Heart" by Stephen
L. Burns is one of the funny stories. Slight and
obvious, it's told from the perspective of Raalt. A thief he's
been imprisoned and is facing death for the theft of a jewel of great
value, the Heart of Arrmik. In the seclusion of his cell he is
visited by fellow thief Clea who offers to free him for a share of
the proceeds from selling the Heart. He accepts, planning to
outwit her at some point and renege on his promise of shared profit.
There's no surprise in this story but the constant misperceptions of
Raalt are amusing.
I
wanted to like Emma
Bull's "The Rending Dark" more than I did. It was
her first professional sale. Two women, the Songsmith Kit and her
more martially inclined companion Marya seek a warm bed out of the
dark and snow in the town of Sallis. Marya is not a normal woman
however. Her left arm is replaced with "lean bone and tendon and
long, curving, cruel claws, all black and shining". That night
they are forced to confront a secret darkness haunting the town that
leaves Marya in fear of her own future. It's a
tale with enticing sci-fi intimations but too much left unexplained
(and not in a good, intriguing way).
Next
is the second of Charles
R. Saunders great woman warrior Dossouye stories, the
first, "Agbewe's Sword", having appeared "Amazons!".
At the end of the first tale, Dossouye was fleeing the ruins of
her old life. At the beginning of the second she is beset by a
pair of bandits. After killing one and allowing the other to
escape with his life, Dossouye encounters a strange song singer.
Soon there is love, dark magic and violence delivered in
Saunder's usual vivid prose.
Charles
De Lint's"The Valley of the Troll" is another comic
story. Swords-woman Aynber and the insufficiently talented
wizard Thorn Hawkwood make an attempt on the treasure of a troll.
There's humorous dialogue, a troll to outwit and bandits. Good
stuff but nothing special.
|
Deborah J. Ross |
"Imperatrix"
by Deborah J.
Ross (written as Deborah Wheeler) has a wizard, and a hired
swords-woman with the ability to tame great alien beasts called
Weires. There are strange realms of magic to be traveled by
mystic roads and in the background an enemy in the form of the
Imperator. I found the story unclear, the characters less than
engaging and the title a spoiler for a secret that isn't really very
secret.
"Blood
of Sorcery" by Jennifer
Roberson doesn't work at all. A prelude to her lengthy
"Chronicles of the Cheysuli" series, it's a boring start.
Keely, a shape-changing princess, has been captured by an evil
wizard. She has been raped repeatedly with the intent of
impregnation. Possession of their child will allow him to work his
demonic magic and take control of the lands. Tainted by his
seed she is stripped of her native abilities but must still find some way
to escape her captor. It only left me sleepy.
Pat
Murphy's "With Four Lean Hounds" is a fairy tale flavored
story. A young thief named Tarsia learns she might be the lost
daughter of the Lady of the Winds, a mighty figure whose power
stretches over the lands for both good and ill. Deciding to
seek the Lady out, Tarsia falls in with a minstrel she realizes has
the same goal. Really not S&S, it's an adequate story with
an enjoyable heroine. The ending's a little unclear but it
works well enough. The same can't be said for the next
story.
Anodea Judith's "House in the Forest" is a
dull, pointless story of a healer and a goddess. It's
inclusion is a mystery.
|
Diana L. Paxson |
The
rape-revenge theme reaches its apex in Diana
L. Paxson's "Sword of Yraine". A group of
girls, about to be dedicated to various goddesses, are captured by a
group of bandits who invade the shrine where they live. One of
the girls is Shanna, daughter of a nobleman and a skilled if untested swords-woman. When the bandits decide to rape their prisoners Shanna
sees it as her duty to free
her comrades. Despite her training, Shanna's less than bloodthirsty reactions are believably human.There is a brutality to the bandits' assault absent from Cook's or Roberson's stories and it's terrifying. Not especially S&S but easily one of the best written stories in
the collection.
Described
in its introduction as a tall tale, Michael Ward's "Daton and
the Dead Things" is delivered in colorful and snarky tones. It
is my favorite of the comical stories. An adventurer in search
of her runaway companion chases him to a ruined city and runs up
against a very logically and literally minded cyclops. It's one
of the clearest S&S stories in the book.
Janet
Fox, another alumni of
"Amazons!", turns up here with "Gate of the Damned".
Swords-woman Scorpia falls in with a crusade being led by
Baucis, King of Thurgia. The king aims to free the demon ruled
lands lying beyond the town of Abzu Rii, also known as the Gate of
the Damned. A central focus of the story is Scorpia's relationship
with the mercenary captain Telis, rooted in the loneliness of life on
the road and an intimacy with death and violence. There is also
beastmen, battle and an ancient, sorcerous queen, so good stuff.
The
longest story in the book is Robin
W. Bailey's "Child of Orcus". Set during the
reign of Roman emperor Claudius,
ex-gladiator Diana serves his wife, Messalina.
Diana is sent to investigate rumors of a cult of Orcus, god of
death, that has supposedly discovered the secret of immortality. Diana
does indeed discover the cult and the nature of its secret.
Ultimately she ends up waging several bets with Orcus himself. I didn't love the story but Diana's final action did make me love her.
"Things
Come in Threes" by Dorothy
J. Heydt is ostensibly a humorous short-short tale but I
wasn't able to tell. It's a disappointing end to a book that
rarely rises above the average.
"Sword
and Sorceress" is nothing more than an average anthology of S&S.
Too often, like in "Blood of Sorcery" or "House
in the Forest" the stories lie flat and lifeless on the pages. There are too fairly generic duos like in "The Rending Dark" who come upon a monster and have kill it. The comic stories are at least funny but they're all pretty
much one-note tales with nothing else. Above all, S&S
needs to be exciting and a lot of these stories just aren't.
I've
read elsewhere there was a dearth of stories for Bradley to choose
from but that changed with the second volume in the series.
I'll probably give that one a chance down the line but I can't
really recommend this one. The highlights are easily "Gimmile's
Song" and "Severed Heads" and both are
available in anthologies you
should own already. I know this book was important in sounding the call
for a new approach to S&S but it's just not that good. Of
course it's available cheap and
any completist should get one anyway.
I have that one but haven't read it yet. I've dipped randomly into some of the later volumes but wasn't overly impressed. I suppose I should read one or two all the way through.
ReplyDeleteI admit it's a little hard going back in time and assessing the impact the book must have had. It would be easier if it was a better book.
ReplyDeleteI have Sword and Sorceress III, and frankly, I don't care for most of the tales. No offense to the authors or the editor, but this is not my idea of real S&S. And from what I have read, the series does not get any better. If only Swords against Darkness, or Echoes of Valor had gone on for this many volumes!
ReplyDeleteThe idea of either of those series running over twenty volumes is mind blowing. Wagner was one of the best anthologists bar none (his Year's Best Horror collections are one of my most prized possessions).
ReplyDeleteI suspect Bradley's title is really more of a marketing device than any real indicator of the contents. The failure of so many of the stories to actually conform to even the loosest definition of S&S is my biggest criticism of the anthology.
Interesting clear-sighted overview! Enjoyed reading this.
ReplyDeleteHey. thanks for stopping by and thanx for the kind words.
Delete